Here's a fun thing linguists figured out a long time ago: the words we choose aren't neutral. Same event, different framing, wildly different impression. It's not always intentional — writers reach for vivid language, editors punch up headlines, and somewhere along the way the story quietly tips from informing you to nudging you.

That's interesting! It's also worth knowing about.

Unbiased is a toolkit for poking at that. Paste in any text — a news article, a speech, a strongly-worded email from your uncle — and it'll map out the emotional language, flag logical fallacies, and take a guess at political lean. Not to tell you what to think about any of it. Just to show you what's in there.

The underlying ideas come from decades of media literacy research and rhetoric. Framing effects, persuasive appeals, the gap between denotation and connotation — academics have been writing about this stuff since before the internet made it a daily problem. This is just a faster way to run the analysis yourself.

It's for the curious. Students, teachers, journalists, debate nerds, people who read too many op-eds — anyone who finds it interesting to look under the hood of a piece of writing and see how it's put together.